<
|
![]() |
| Protecting a water supply requires delineation of a time-of-travel of groundwater flow. Three methods are compared here for a community well field. |
![]() |
| A cross section of the alluvial aquifer shows hydrogeologic conditions that affect groundwater movement and the cross-valley extent of each delineation method. |
The illustration above compares the results of each TOT method to determine a source water protection area for six wells installed in a shallow alluvial aquifer. A cross section through the valley (see line A - A on map, above) shows a three-dimensional view of this aquifer. Alluvial aquifers occupy river valleys and are typically composed of layers of sand and gravel deposited by flowing water. These aquifers are attractive to water suppliers because the shallow, highly permeable sand and gravel provides abundant groundwater that is relatively free of natural contaminants (e.g., hardness, iron). However, alluvial aquifers often lack thick overlying layers of low permeability materials to slow the recharge from above, and thus they are particularly vulnerable to contaminants introduced at the land surface.
The least complicated method for determining a source water protection area is a calculated fixed-radius, consisting of a circle drawn around a well to delineate a specified time-of-travel. The radius of the circle is defined by the wells pumping rate, the thickness and permeability of the aquifer, and the specified time-of-travel. For multiple wells, the calculated circles are merged to define the protection area for the entire wellfield. This method is relatively easy to perform with limited information, but it often results in a larger wellhead management area than other methods. In a narrow alluvial valley for example, this technique may unnecessarily include the surrounding uplands in the protection area.
A second method uses the physical and hydrologic characteristics of the area to map the protection zone. With this method, the protection area around a well is governed by the presence of groundwater flow boundaries which are based on rock and soil characteristics, the extent and thickness of the aquifer, and surface and groundwater drainage divides. In the example, boundaries are established to the east by lateral extent of the alluvium and low permeability of the valley walls, and on the west by a river that acts as a constant recharge boundary (constant supply of water). Because groundwater flow within alluvial aquifers usually parallels the direction of river flow, in this case northeast to southwest, the delineated protection area is primarily along the river. One difficulty in using this method is the accurate determination of the upstream and downstream boundaries that correspond to the selected TOT distance.
A third method of delineating a protection area relies on a computer program to model the groundwater flow system. Computer models typically require large inputs of data describing the dimensions and hydrogeologic properties of the aquifer materials in order to simulate the aquifers behavior. Information is also needed about well construction, pumping rates, river conductance (how much water flows through the base of the river channel), recharge and evapotranspiration rates. Models can be either two- or three-dimensional representations of groundwater systems. In our example, a three-dimensional model was used to simulate groundwater flow in response to pumping from six production wells. Water flow paths are determined in the model by placing "particles" at the wells and instructing the computer to trace their routes backward for the specified TOT, here ten years. The area bounded by the flow paths then becomes the source water protection area. The results show that little groundwater is drawn from the down-gradient side of the pumping wells (southwest) and that the protection area extends a considerable distance up-gradient to the northeast. Although the results of modeling often imply a high level of accuracy, one of the fundamental principles of groundwater modeling is that without sufficient data to properly formulate a model, the results may be no closer to reality than the arbitrary fixed-radius method.
The methods used to delineate source water protection areas
each require increased data to provide reliable estimates of
protection areas. The Geological Survey Bureau will select a
delineation method for each public water supply based on the
quality and quantity of hydrologic data that is available. Over
the next four years, protection areas will be determined for
approximately 1,950 public water supplies consisting of
approximately 5,300 wells. For many public supplies, the
arbitrary fixed-radius method will be sufficient. Much greater
accuracy will be required for more vulnerable water supplies.
Though a daunting task, identifying and protecting these areas
will ensure that high quality water will be available for
generations to come.
Adapted from Iowa Geology 1998, Iowa Department of Natural Resources