<
Keith E. Schilling and Calvin F. Wolter
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Figure 1a. Bank erosion and
channel widening in a pasture area. |
Figure 1b. Tiles discharging into Walnut Creek. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Figure 1c. Bank erosion near debris dam. | Figure 1d. Large debris dam. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Figure 1e. Stable slump blocks in
channelized reach of Walnut Creek. |
Figure 1f. Increased bank erosion on meander cut bank. |
![]() |
| Figure 2. Spatial relationships among variables. Spatial relationships exist between many of the channel features mapped at Walnut Creek. Lines that connect two boxes show statistically significant correlations (l=0.05). System variables were quantified for each ¼ mile segment of stream by either totaling numbers of features (i.e., tiles, debris dams), or averaging running totals (streambed thickness, left and right bank erosion rates) for each segment. Stream morphology was characterized by channel width and sinuosity. Channel width was determined by averaging the profile widths (see PLATE 1) measured in ¼ mile segments. Sinuosity was calculated by dividing the actual stream length by the straight-line distance between ¼ mile segments. Statistical relationships between variables were determined by regression analysis. There is evidence for scale dependence for some of the relationships. In general, dividing stream segments into ½ mile and one-mile increments leads to fewer significant relationships between variables. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Figure 3. Bank erosion and channel characteristics. |
||
| Figure 3a. Degree of channel sinuosity and average bank erosion rate. | Figure 3b. Estimated contributions of sediment to Walnut Creek. | |
Degree of channel sinuosity and average bank erosion rate varied considerably in Walnut Creek yet both features followed a remarkably similar pattern (Figure 3a). Sinuosity varied from one in channelized reaches to 2.3 in a highly meandered segment. In channelized areas, stream banks were well-vegetated and the annual average bank erosion rate was less than 0.05 ft/year. In meandering segments, the stream was actively eroding cut banks and creating wider channels. The average annual average bank erosion rate in these areas was greater than 0.2 ft/year.
The total annual sediment load contribution from stream bank erosion was estimated to be 3,600 tons/year (Figure 3b). Based on a GIS-based sediment erosion model under development for the watershed, this sediment total represents approximately 30% of the annual suspended sediment load measured in the channel. Contributions from tributaries and gullies comprise another 30% of the annual total, and sheet and rill erosion contributes approximately 40%.
![]() |
Figure 4. Streambed thickness and debris dams. The thickness of streambed materials in Walnut Creek was significantly greater in channel segments containing more debris dams. Streambed materials, consisting of silty muck, exceeded one foot in depth behind numerous debris dams located near Stream Mile 4. Where the bed thickness was less than 0.2 feet, debris dams were less prevalent and Walnut Creek flowed on top of pre-Illinoian till. Sand was the dominant channel sediment only downstream of cattle-crossing areas where the till substrate was heavily trampled and disturbed (PLATE 1). |
| Figure 5. Land cover. Land use near Walnut Creek was significantly related ( l=0.05) to many channel characteristics. In areas dominated by row crop (Figure 5a), Walnut Creek has been straightened and is now narrower; stream bank erosion is minimal, and the channel bottom consists of thinly mantled till. In forested areas (Figure 5b), debris dams are more numerous and streambed sediment has accumulated in the channel. Debris dams were more prevalent in forested areas dominated by weak scrub trees (stream miles 0-3) than in areas typified by native oak savanna (stream miles 3-8). |
![]() |
![]() |
PLATE I. Spatial relationships of GPS and GIS coverages.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Walnut Creek Nonpoint Source Pollution Monitoring Project is supported, in part, by Region 7 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through a 319 Nonpoint Source grant to the Iowa Department of Natural Resources. Pauline Drobney and the remaining staff at the Neil E. Smith National Wildlife Refuge are gratefully acknowledged for their considerable support of field activities. Access to properties owned by private individuals was greatly appreciated.
Presented as a poster at The Geological Society of America 33rd Annual North-Central Section Meeting, April 22-23, 1999, Champaign, IL.